Blog
RSS FeedThoughts on Christian Voluntarism, technology, and personal growth
Nothing New Under the Sun
My friend builds AI agents that ship code autonomously: 150 PRs merged while you sleep. His system caches every solved problem as a reusable "skill." When I asked about cache invalidation, he admitted there's no mechanism for it yet. That admission has been rattling around in my head ever since. Because the skill knows *what* but not *why*. And when context shifts, confident wrong output has no way to feel the dissonance.
I Wish AI Would Get Boring
AI hype promises magic. Reality delivers chaos: unpredictable outputs, failed pilots, and "pilot purgatory" where 95% of projects never show ROI. The dirty secret? Boring AI wins. Like Postgres or S3, the most valuable tech becomes invisible infrastructure. While bubbles inflate on AGI promises, the real competitive advantage belongs to those building narrow, predictable tools that actually ship.
The Vibepocalypse
92% of developers now use AI coding tools daily. 45% of that code contains security flaws. Analysts project $1.5 trillion in technical debt by 2027. The six-month wall that keeps killing vibe-coded projects? It's legacy code on fast-forward, but with nobody to ask why the decisions were made. Because they weren't decisions. They were pattern matches. The vibepocalypse isn't the end of software development. It's the end of pretending you can skip the hard parts.
Humility in the Age of AI Gurus and Hot Takes
Everyone's predicting AI will revolutionize everything, or destroy it. Meanwhile, 70% of 2024's AI predictions already aged poorly. Here's what I've learned from telling clients "I don't think AI can do what you want": there's a crucial difference between humility and helplessness. One keeps you learning. The other leaves you paralyzed. In a world of confident hot takes, maybe honest uncertainty is the real competitive edge.
Prompt Engineering Is Just Communication (And That's the Point)
Prompt engineering isn't dying; it's just communication by another name. The same skills that help you explain complex ideas to colleagues work with LLMs: resolving ambiguity, providing context, validating understanding. The difference? No body language, no facial expressions. Just text. So the text becomes everything. And if you can't push back when a model confidently gives you the wrong answer, you're not using the tool; it's using you.
The Archaeology of Legacy Code: Reading Systems Like Texts
Legacy code isn't a mess to fix; it's a site to excavate. You're sifting through artifacts left by developers you'll never meet, reading their structures like ancient texts: the original architecture, the evolutionary mutations, the emergency patches that became permanent. Learn to recognize which layer you're in, extend grace to builders working with limited tools, and discover why the best archaeologists write code future excavators can actually read.